Skip to content

Decision support for diagnostic labs

A second reader for every study. The doctor stays in the loop.

Your radiologists read first. Our AI then analyses the same study independently and, when it sees something worth a second look, shows its reasoning. The radiologist accepts or overrides — and always makes the final call.

  • Radiologist reads first
  • Reasoning you can inspect
  • Every decision logged

Doctor-in-the-loop

Six steps, one principle: the physician decides

The second reader is designed around how radiologists already work. It never sees the study first, never signs a report, and never acts without a clinician's decision.

Step 1 of 6 · System

Study arrives

A new imaging study reaches the lab's existing worklist from PACS. Nothing changes about how it is acquired or routed.

StudyRadiologistSecond readerDecisionAudit

The AI never signs a report. Only the radiologist can finalise a decision.

Radiology second reader

When it disagrees, it shows you why

A flag on its own isn't useful. Each one arrives with the evidence behind it, laid out so a radiologist can confirm or dismiss it quickly and confidently.

  • Bounding boxes and heat regions show exactly where the model looked.
  • Plain-language reasoning explains what prompted the flag.
  • Measurements are shown for the reader to verify, not to accept blindly.
  • Accept or override in one step; overrides capture a short rationale.
Explore Radiology AI
Second reader — reasoning view
Overlay layers

Read comparison

Disagreement

Radiologist

No focal finding recorded in Region A.

Second reader

Localised change suggested in Region A.

Reasoning

  1. 1. Texture in the boxed region differs from the surrounding area.
  2. 2. The heat region shows where the model focused its attention.
  3. 3. Measured extent is shown for the reader to verify.

Awaiting the radiologist's decision.

Illustrative example — not real patient data.

Genomic health profile

Whole genome sequencing summary

Prepared for physician review

Pending physician review

Variant summary

Structure of the variant summary in a genomics report
ClassificationWhat the reviewer seesStatus
Flagged for physician reviewEvidence summary, inheritance and referencesReview required
Uncertain significanceCurrent evidence and reclassification notesClinician judgement
Likely benignListed for completenessFor information

Health profile

Summary of relevant findings, written for clinicians.

Diet & lifestyle

Guidance considerations for discussion with the patient.

Treatment suggestions

Options for the physician to review — not a prescription.

Interpretation and any clinical action rest with the ordering physician.

Illustrative example — not real patient data.

Genomics

From sequence to a report physicians can act on

Whole genome sequencing and targeted mutation analysis, organised into clear health profiles with diet and lifestyle guidance and treatment-plan suggestions — all prepared for physician review, never sent as instructions.

Likely benign Uncertain significance Flagged for physician review
Explore Genomics
A laboratory technician in a lab coat and gloves arranging sample tubes in a rack, seen from the side.
Lab operations dashboard

Today

Awaiting read

Ordered by priority

Second read complete

Ready for sign-off

Flags to review

Reasoning attached

Signed

Logged to audit trail

For labs

Built to fit the lab you already run

We work with diagnostic labs as partners. The second reader sits alongside your PACS, RIS and LIS, follows your reading protocols, and gives lab leadership a clear view of flags, decisions and follow-ups.

  • No change to how studies are acquired or routed.
  • Operational dashboards for worklists, flags awaiting review and sign-off.
  • A partnership model with clinical onboarding and ongoing support.

Trust & safety

Accountability is designed in, not added on

Clinical AI earns trust slowly. We build for it with clear roles, inspectable reasoning and a record of every decision.

  • Physicians decide

    The software offers decision support only. Every finding is accepted, edited or overridden by a qualified clinician, and only a clinician can sign a report.

  • Transparent reasoning

    When the second reader raises a flag it shows its work: the region, the overlays and a plain-language explanation, so the reader can judge it on its merits.

  • Full audit trail

    Reads, flags, decisions and rationales are recorded in an append-only log that supports clinical governance and quality review.

  • Privacy by design

    Data handling is designed around minimisation, access control and encryption, and is configured to meet each partner lab's own policies and obligations.

Read our approach to trust & safety
Audit trail
  1. Study received

    09:02 · System

    Routed from PACS to the reading worklist

  2. Radiologist read submitted

    09:15 · Radiologist

    Initial impression recorded before any AI output was shown

  3. Second reader analysis completed

    09:15 · Second reader

    Independent analysis of the same study

  4. Disagreement flagged

    09:16 · Second reader

    Reasoning, overlays and region references attached

  5. Radiologist decision

    09:21 · Radiologist

    Flag reviewed; decision and written rationale captured

  6. Report signed

    09:24 · Radiologist

    Final report signed by the radiologist

Each record is append-only and attributable.

Illustrative example — not real patient data.

Science

The science behind Clarity

Short, cited explainers on imaging and genomics. Every fact links to a source we actually read.

Explore the Science hub

See the second reader in your own workflow

Book a walkthrough with our team. We'll show how doctor-in-the-loop decision support fits alongside your existing systems, and answer your clinical, technical and governance questions.